I do not think richief is a sex abuser. It is conceivable to me that a relative of his has been the victim of one. If that is the case, I share his anger.

I have read that in the United States one out of seven women is raped at least once in her life. If this is true, there are certainly rapists who have established profiles on XNXX. When I learn that a woman I know has been raped I want to apologize to her on behalf of the entire male sex. Rape is a horrible crime, and not something I would be physically capable of. I would not get aroused in a situation like that.

 

The only part of your first paragraph that contains any truth is the first four words.

As for the second paragraph you have no right to apologise for the "entire male sex" as the "entire male sex" are not rapist, and I am sure that such an apology would be ignored as the empty gesture that it is.

 

That is clever. I readily acknowledge it.

 

I have not read any of his stories in their entirety. What I have read leaves me with a queasy feeling. :twisted:

 

Here's a little story about Carrie joslin and the pornographer. Now ask yourself, could she have really fucked a dog?


Pornographer: "Carrie, will take your clothes off in front of the camera for $100?"

Carrie J: "Gosh yes, that's more money than I've ever seen."

Pornographer: "Carrie, will masturbate with a twelve inch dildo in front of the camera for $200?"

Carrie J: "Gosh yes, that's more money than I've ever seen."

Pornographer: "Carrie, will you engage in homosexual sex acts with another model in front of the camera for $500?"

Carrie J: "Gosh yes, that's more money than I've ever seen."

Pornographer: "Carrie, will let a dog mount you in front of the camera for $1000?"

Carrie J: "Gosh no. I'm too classy for that. Did you know I have a Bachelor's degree in business and a Master's degree in Marketing?"

Pornographer: "No, I didn't know that."

Carrie J: "It's true, I read it on the internet."

 

Doggo, you obviously missed this post, maybe you should take a minute and read about your beloved Carrie and her mob...

Ukrainian scammers, don't you just love them.

 

Don't be daft, he didn't miss it he chose to simply ignore it as he always does.

5 years this crew have been operating exactly the same way on loads of different forums. It's just a repeat pattern with the same names, the same type of posts, the same socks backups and the result are always the same. Banned. but you'll always get one or two who just can't accept the truth even though it's all laid bare for them. I feel sorry for them in a way because it makes them look so bloody stupid and often turns many decent members against them because they just will not accept simple facts and realise they have been mugged.

 

And you call yourself a writer!

Have you forgotten what a "double negative" is, and how two negatives cancel each other out?

Well, that same rule applies here- when you're called a lying cunt BY a lying cunt, it balances out to zero. In fact, in this case I think it might even be a compliment! :excited:

Tee-hee! :excited:

 

Oh it is so good to see that the beat goes on.

 

That's your best argument.

 

A girl on this forum JUST contacted me about being raped. Her perpetrator got away scot-free...

 

You still beating this dead horse DL?

 

So who dropped them in it?

The thing that really pisses me about this is that she sent bestiality photos, of herself or someone else, by PM and who ever she sent them to betrayed her trust.

What a PRICK.

All he had to do was tell her thanks but no thanks and end it there.

BUT OH NO, the devious slimebag had to report it instead.

So the one who causes all the harm remains invisible while the one who betrayed a trust stays invisible.

Yeah, that's fair

 

Second to last line is incoherent. Lets try;

So the one who betrayed a trust and caused all the harm remains invisible.

And is still a jerk.

 

origen01's best argument against Carrie Joslin being the model in the photos "Carrie Joslin" posted here is that she never posted a credible verification photo. That should have been fairly easy. All she had to do was pose for a new photo with a sign that said something like, "Carrie Joslin loves XNXX." To be even more credible she could have been actually writing the sign.

Because she did not do that I find it next to impossible to believe that she would have posed for a photo of herself having sex with a dog.

For reasons I am unable to disclose here I believe that Carrie Joslin is who she claimed to be. Nevertheless, the dog story exceeds the bounds of credibility.

 

Naive!!!, yes you....your beloved carrie works in the xxx porn industry, if the money was enough I would imagine she'd do anything, and that includes having sex with Lassie....the wording "having sex" could mean anything from the doggy being balls deep to it licking her snatch.

Sounds like you might actually work for Carrie Inc or possibly get free membership to her site, there seems to be no other reason why you vehemently stand up for the fake arsed bitch.

 

All points noted....

I just feel sorry for Lassie.