Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

Why I finally gave up and embraced Apple’s walled garden

After decades as a diehard Windows user, I’ve made the switch to all-Apple computing. I ditched my Windows PC and laptop, my Android smartphone, and my Wear OS smartwatch for a MacBook Pro 16, iPad, iPhone, and Watch. I’m all in.

It’s still early in the process, but the change has already been illuminating if incredibly costly — it’s expensive to make such a significant change in platforms. The transition has required changes to how I get things done, but it’s offered some distinct advantages that have made the investment a good one.

Recommended Videos

More power, less hassle

Apple MacBook Pro 16 downward view showing keyboard and speaker.
Mark Coppock / Digital Trends

Before this transition, I used a Windows desktop for my most intensive work. Equipped with an older (but still fast) AMD processor and Nvidia GPU and coupled with three 27-inch 4K displays, it was my workhorse machine. I’ve replaced it with a MacBook Pro 16, which I chose over a Mac Studio, thanks to its ability to provide almost as much performance in a portable package.

So far, the MacBook has served as an excellent desktop replacement. I’m using a Caldigit TB3+ Thunderbolt 3 dock to feed my Ethernet connection and two of my displays, with the other display plugged into the MacBook’s HDMI port and with power provided by the MagSafe 3 connection. When I need to unplug and use the MacBook outside of my home office, it’s a simple enough process.

The configuration provides better performance and less noise than my PC. The MacBook is completely silent unless I’m gaming, while my loud Windows PC fans were likelier to spin up at random times and run longer. The M3 Max powers through my most demanding productivity work while offering a ton of overhead for when I start delving into video editing and large language models (LLMs).

Stage manager in macOS Ventura.
Digital Trends

And then there’s the transition from Windows to macOS. One reason I decided to change up my computing so drastically was a spate of issues with Windows 11. I was spending too much time on things like getting OneDrive to sync correctly and fixing the Ethernet connection to my router, and every Windows update seemed to bring a new problem to resolve. It was maddening.

Meanwhile, the MacBook Pro 14 I used was remarkably stable, without requiring monthly updates (or more often on occasion). While I had always defended Windows as being as reliable as macOS, my recent experiences changed my perspective. I’ve suffered none of the same kinds of issues with the MacBook Pro 16. The transition required some adjustments, but it’s been surprisingly trouble-free.

Consistency is key

Stage Manager on iPad Pro with M1
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends

It wasn’t just reliability that swayed my decision. Going back and forth between macOS and Windows was jarring, a fact that was compounded by the increased use of my iPad 11 Pro. MacOS and iPadOS aren’t identical but are much closer in look and feel.

The effect was compounded when I switched from my aging LG G8 ThinQ and Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 to an iPhone 15 Pro Max and a Watch Ultra 2. Constantly transitioning from macOS to iPadOS to Windows to Android to Wear OS was a real pain, while the combination of macOS, iPadOS, iOS, and watchOS provides a consistency that makes my workflow much more comfortable.

An Apple Watch Ultra 2 showing the Double Tab icon in Smart Stack.
Bryan M. Wolfe / Digital Trends

There was a time when I didn’t consider a tablet, smartphone, and smartwatch to be elements of my computing platform, but today they all play important parts. I use the iPhone and iPad to work on my novel using the excellent Scrivener app, something I couldn’t do on Android, and both support a host of other computing duties while the Watch keeps me updated on projects and conversations. They may not be “real” computers, but I increasingly use them for real computing tasks. I have a lot of irons in the fire, and I need these tools to keep me organized and productive. Simply put, Apple provides a more cohesive, integrated, and predictable platform, something I wouldn’t have believed before making the switch.

I’m not saying that Apple’s products are perfect. They’re not. But my previous platform was causing difficulties that I just didn’t have to accept. You could say that going all-Apple has raised the bar, dramatically increasing what I expect from my computing devices. It will take a lot for Microsoft and Google to win me back.

Mark Coppock
Mark Coppock is a Freelance Writer at Digital Trends covering primarily laptop and other computing technologies. He has…
M3 Ultra vs. M4 Max: Which is better? Benchmarks can’t tell either
2025 Mac Studio

Apple surprised us with its announcement of the new Mac Studio this week, and confused us with its chip choices -- the M4 Max and the M3 Ultra. It's hard enough to tell which chip is more powerful just from their names, but according to early benchmarks, it's also hard to tell from their CPU performance.

https://x.com/VadimYuryev/status/1897849477706481701?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1897849477706481701%7Ctwgr%5E8073e41e643559d3c995c3a698fc2b5523a61222%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2F9to5mac.com%2F2025%2F03%2F06%2Fm3-ultra-m4-max-chip-benchmark%2F

Read more
The new Mac Studio absolutely baffles me in one key way
Apple Mac Studio with M4 Max and M3 Ultra chips and two Apple Studio Display monitors.

Way back when Steve Jobs returned to Apple and saved it from bankruptcy, he implemented his famous product quadrant: Apple should have desktops and laptops for consumers and professionals. These four categories should contain just one of the best Macs each -- no more, no less.

The idea was that you should be able to instantly differentiate each device and know who it’s for and what it does, and it worked incredibly effectively. Yet when I look at the new Mac Studio that Apple unveiled today, I get the feeling that Steve Jobs would be most displeased.

Read more
Want Apple’s best Mac Studio? Prepare to pay over $14,000
The new Apple Mac Studio next to a monitor.

Apple just launched its new Mac Studio alongside the latest MacBook Air. The new Studio comes equipped with either an M4 Max or an M3 Ultra chip, and while it sounds mighty powerful and fully capable of rivaling some of the best Macs, it's also crazy expensive. If you want to configure it with all the bells and whistles Apple offers, you'll have to pay over $14,500 -- a huge increase over the previous generation.

The new Mac Studio is certainly nothing to turn your nose up at. The M4 Max configuration starts with a 14-core CPU, 32-core GPU, and a 16-core neural engine. You're also getting 36GB of unified memory and 512GB of SSD storage. This will set you back $1,999, which is the same as the last-gen Mac Studio that came equipped with the M2 Max and the M2 Ultra chips, so we're all good.

Read more